UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. __ )

Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

ADEIA INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒ No fee required

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

Notice of Annual Meeting

of Stockholders

Thursday, May 9, 2024

10:00 a.m., Pacific Time

The 2024 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) of Adeia Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually, via live webcast. In order to attend you must register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/adea/2024. To provide a safe, consistent and convenient experience to all stockholders regardless of location, the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via live webcast on the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. Stockholders virtually attending the Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. We encourage you to attend online and participate in the Annual Meeting, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before the Annual Meeting to ensure you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts.

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes.

These items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice. The Board of Directors (“Board”) has fixed the close of business on March 13, 2024 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting, or at any adjournments of the Annual Meeting.

We are pleased to be furnishing proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the Internet. We believe that this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials and lowers the costs of printing and distributing our Annual Meeting materials. On or about March 27, 2024, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) was mailed to our stockholders containing instructions on how to access our 2024 Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and how to vote online. The Notice also included instructions on how you can receive a copy of your Annual Meeting materials, including the notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, and proxy card by mail, via e-mail or by downloading them online. If you choose to receive your Annual Meeting materials by mail, the notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement from the Board, proxy card and annual report will be enclosed. If you choose to receive your Annual Meeting materials via e-mail, the e-mail will contain voting instructions and links to the annual report and the proxy statement on the Internet, both of which are available at http://www.proxyvote.com and on our website at http://investors.adeia.com. If you access http://www.proxyvote.com using the instructions on the Notice, you will also be given the option to elect to receive future proxy materials by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to the annual meeting materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive future proxy materials by e-mail or in printed form by mail will remain in effect until you terminate such election.

In order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are requested to submit your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Adeia Inc.
3025 Orchard Parkway
San Jose, CA 95134

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING

OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 9, 2024

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use prior to or at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Adeia Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, herein referred to as the “Company” or “Adeia”), a Delaware corporation, to be held at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, May 9, 2024 and at any adjournments or postponements thereof for the following purposes:

We made this proxy statement and accompanying form of proxy available to stockholders beginning on March 27, 2024.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on

May 9, 2024:

This proxy statement, form of proxy and the Company’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available electronically at http://www.proxyvote.com and on our website at http://investors.adeia.com.

ANNUAL MEETING SUMMARY

ABOUT THE MEETING

What is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will vote on: (1) the election of seven directors; (2) the compensation of our named executive officers, on an advisory (non-binding) basis; (3) the approval of an Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan; (4) the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2024; and (5) any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Who is Entitled to Vote?

Only holders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. The outstanding common stock constitutes the only class of our securities entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, and each holder of common stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. No cumulative voting is permitted for the election of directors. At the close of business on March 13, 2024, there were 108,452,822 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

What are the Board’ Recommendations on the Proposals?

The Board’s recommendation is set forth together with the description of each proposal in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each nominee for director; FOR the advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; FOR approval of an Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan; and FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company.

How do I Vote My Shares at the Annual Meeting?

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting via live webcast only. Any holder of record of shares of our common stock can attend the virtual Annual Meeting live online. In order to attend you must register in advance at www.viewproxy.com/adea/2024. The Annual Meeting will start at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, May 9, 2024. Stockholders attending the Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. In order to enter the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number, which is included in the Notice or on your proxy card if you are a stockholder of record of shares of common stock or included with your voting instruction card and voting instructions received from your broker, bank or other agent if your shares of common stock are held in “street name.” Instructions on how to attend and participate online are available at www.viewproxy.com/adea/2024. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before 10:00 a.m. Pacific time to ensure you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts. The webcast will open 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting. Stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names may vote by proxy by mail, over the Internet, by telephone or online during the Annual Meeting.

Instructions for voting by proxy over the Internet or by mail are set forth on the Notice mailed to you, or on the proxy card mailed to you if you chose to receive materials by mail. Instructions for voting by proxy by telephone are available on the Internet site identified on the Notice mailed to you if you chose to receive materials by mail. The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time on May 8, 2024. If you access http://www.proxyvote.com using the instructions on the Notice, you will also be given the option to elect to receive future proxy materials by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to the proxy materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive future proxy materials by e-mail or in printed form by mail will remain in effect until you terminate such election.

If you sign and return a proxy card by mail but do not give voting instructions, your shares will be voted (1) FOR ALL of the seven (7) nominees named in Proposal No. 1 in this proxy statement; (2) FOR the approval of compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs) as disclosed in this proxy statement; (3) FOR approval of an Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan; (4) FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024; and (5) as the proxy holders deem advisable, in their discretion, on other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

To vote online during the Annual Meeting, follow the provided instructions to join the Annual Meeting at www.viewproxy.com/adea/2024, starting at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, May 9, 2024. The webcast will open 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name, the voting instruction form sent to you by your broker, bank or other nominee should indicate whether the institution has a process for beneficial holders to provide voting instructions over the Internet or by telephone. A number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program that permits stockholders whose shares are held in street name to direct their vote over the Internet or by telephone. If your bank or brokerage firm gives you this opportunity, the voting instructions from the bank or brokerage firm that accompany this proxy statement will tell you how to use the Internet or telephone to direct the vote of shares held in your account. If your voting instruction form does not include Internet or telephone information, please complete and return the voting instruction form in the self-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided by your broker. Stockholders who vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone need not return a proxy card or voting instruction form by mail, but may incur costs, such as usage charges, from telephone companies or Internet service providers.

Please note, however, that if your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote online during the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent and will need to obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.

Can I Change My Vote After I Return My Proxy Card?

Yes, any proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by filing with the Company’s Corporate Secretary an instrument revoking it or by submitting prior to the time of the Annual Meeting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. Stockholders who have voted by proxy over the Internet or by telephone or have executed and returned a proxy and who then attend the Annual Meeting virtually and desire to vote at the Annual Meeting are requested to so notify the Corporate Secretary in writing prior to the time of the Annual Meeting. Attending the meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you specifically request it. We request that all such written notices of revocation to the Company be addressed to Kevin Tanji, Corporate Secretary, Adeia Inc., at the address of our principal executive offices at 3025 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95134. Our telephone number is (408) 473-2500. Stockholders may also revoke their proxy by entering a new vote over the Internet or by telephone.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock as of the Record Date and your shares are held in “street name” by your broker, bank or other agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other agent.

What Does it Mean if I Get More than One Proxy Card?

If your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account, you may receive more than one proxy card. Sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

What Does “Householding” Mean and How Does it Affect Me?

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as “householding.” This procedure allows multiple stockholders residing at the same address the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy statement, if they have elected to receive proxy materials by mail. This allows us to save money by reducing the number of documents we must print and mail, and helps protect the environment as well. Householding is available to both registered stockholders (i.e., those stockholders with certificates registered in their name) and street name holders (i.e., those stockholders who hold their shares through a brokerage).

If you are a registered stockholder that has requested to receive proxy materials by mail and you have consented to our mailing of proxy materials and other stockholder information only to one account in your household, as identified by you, we will deliver or mail a single copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy statement for all registered stockholders residing at the same address. Your consent will be perpetual unless you revoke it, which you may do at any time by contacting the Householding Department of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by calling 1-866-540-7095. If you revoke your consent, we will begin sending you individual copies of future mailings of these documents within 30 days after we receive your revocation notice. If you received a householding mailing this year, and you would like to receive additional copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy statement mailed to you, please call Investor Relations at (408) 473-2500, send an e-mail request to IR@adeia.com, or write to c/o Investor Relations, Adeia Inc., 3025 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134, and we will promptly deliver the requested copy.

Registered stockholders that have requested to receive proxy materials by mail and have not consented to householding will continue to receive copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and our proxy statements for each registered stockholder residing at the same address. As a registered stockholder, you may elect to participate in householding and receive only a single copy of the Annual Reports on Form 10-K and proxy statements for all registered stockholders residing at the same address by contacting Broadridge as outlined above.

Stockholders who hold their shares through a brokerage may elect to participate in householding or revoke their consent to participate in householding by contacting their respective brokers.

What is a Quorum?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to take action at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders representing a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum. We will appoint an election inspector for the meeting to determine whether or not a quorum is present and to tabulate votes cast by proxy or by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting.

What Vote is Required to Approve Each Proposal?

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

The Company has adopted a majority vote standard for non-contested director elections and a plurality vote standard for contested director elections. The voting standard is discussed further under the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors – Required Vote and Board’s Recommendation.”

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present by virtual attendance or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to approve the non-binding advisory named executive officer compensation proposal. Abstentions have the same effect as negative votes on this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted for any purpose in determining whether this proposal has been approved.

Proposal 3 – Approval of an Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve the Company’s amended and restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan”). A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes “for” the approval of our proposed Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan exceeds the number of votes cast “against” the proposed Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “for” or “against” Proposal 4 and thus will have no effect on the proposal.

Proposal 4 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present by virtual attendance or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions have the same effect as negative votes on this proposal. As discussed below, we do not expect to have any broker non-vote for this proposal because Proposal 4 is considered a “routine” matter for which the broker has the discretionary authority to vote on behalf of the beneficial owners.

What are Broker Non-Votes?

If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other stockholder of record, in nominee name or otherwise (typically referred to as being held in “street name”) and you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares, your broker will not have discretion to vote your shares on any of the non-routine matters. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other stockholder of record, exercising its fiduciary powers submits a proxy for the Annual Meeting but does not vote on a particular proposal because such holder does not have discretionary voting authority with respect to that proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Under the rules that govern brokers, brokers have the discretion to vote on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. At the Annual Meeting, Proposal 1 (Election of Directors), Proposal 2 (Executive Compensation) and Proposal 3 (approval of an Amended and Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan) are considered non-routine matters, and therefore brokers do not have the discretion to vote and broker non-votes may occur. Proposal 4 (ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm) is treated as a routine matter; therefore we do not expect any broker non-votes for Proposal 4.

Broker non-votes will be counted as shares present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker regarding the voting of your shares.

What Happens if I Abstain?

Proxies marked “abstain” will be counted as shares present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum, but for purposes of determining the outcome of a proposal, they will be treated as a “no” or “none” vote depending upon the matter to be voted upon. Please see “What vote is required to approve each proposal?” above for the specific result of an abstention vote.

How Will Adeia Solicit Proxies?

We have retained Broadridge to assist in the distribution of proxy materials. The costs and expenses of preparing and mailing proxy solicitation materials for the Annual Meeting and other costs of the proxy solicitation will be borne by us. We expect to pay a fee in the amount of approximately $26,000 to Alliance Advisors as our proxy solicitor. Certain of our officers, employees and third parties may also solicit the submission of proxies authorizing the voting of shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. Such solicitations may be made by telephone, facsimile transmission or personal solicitation. No additional compensation will be paid to officers, directors or regular employees for such services. We may pay fees to other third-party solicitors. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in sending proxy material to stockholders.

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find further information in this proxy statement.

References to “Adeia,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Adeia Inc. (formerly known as Xperi Holding Corporation) and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “SpinCo” refer to “Xperi Inc.”, which was separated from Adeia on October 1, 2022. References to “GAAP” refer to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. References to “RSUs” refer to time-based vesting restricted stock units. References to “PSUs” refer to company-designated performance-based vesting restricted stock units.

Background of Adeia

Adeia is a leading research and development (R&D) and intellectual property (IP) licensing company that accelerates the adoption of innovative technologies in the media and semiconductor industries. Adeia’s fundamental innovations underpin technology solutions that are shaping and elevating the future of digital entertainment and electronics. Adeia’s IP portfolio powers the connected devices that touch the lives of millions of people around the world every day as they live, work and play.

On October 1, 2022, our product business was separated through a tax-efficient spin-off transaction (the “Separation”) and became an independent, publicly traded company named Xperi Inc. (“SpinCo”). We retain no ownership interest in SpinCo. Following the Separation, we retained our IP licensing business, changed our name to Adeia Inc. and began trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “ADEA.”

Impact of Business Separation

As a result of the Separation, SpinCo received or retained over 95% of the pre-Separation employees, over 50% of the pre-Separation revenue generators and approximately 70% of the pre-Separation operating expenses. Given the significance of the operations of SpinCo, the Separation impacted almost every aspect of the Company’s business operations, including the Company’s systems, procedures, leadership, corporate governance, ESG assessments and goals and financial performance. In evaluating the Company’s performance and executive compensation, the Company’s management team, Board, and the Compensation Committee of the Board (“Compensation Committee”) took into account these substantial changes during 2023.

Business Highlights

Following the transformational year the Company had in 2022 as a result of the Separation, 2023 marked the Company’s first full fiscal year focused on our IP licensing business. Our 2023 total revenue was $388.8 million, representing an 11.4% decrease from the prior year. The decrease was due to the execution of a new, multi-year license agreement with Micron Technology in the first quarter of 2022 and the execution of a long-term license agreement with a leading consumer electronics and OTT service provider in the second quarter of 2022, for which a meaningful portion of the total revenue was recognized in the respective quarters, and in part due to a decline in royalty revenue from certain pay-TV customers. The decline was partially offset by the execution of two long-term license agreements with Kioxia and Western Digital in the first quarter of 2023 and execution of a long-term renewal contract with Samsung in the third quarter of 2023, for which a portion of revenue was recognized up-front in the respective quarters.

In 2023, we continued to execute new and renewal license agreements across multiple verticals and geographic regions, including the following:

In addition to the deal momentum in 2023 highlighted above, the Company successfully executed on its operational and strategic goals, including the following highlights:

Governance Highlights

We are committed to high standards of corporate governance. The Company’s corporate governance program continues to feature the following:

Environmental, Social and Governance Impact

We remain focused on responsible business conduct related to our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) impact and the manner in which we manage our business. On October 1, 2022, following completion of the Separation, we adopted an initial ESG statement for our standalone Adeia business, which notes our commitment to sustainability and its impact on the environment and society, as well as ethical and corporate governance considerations. In 2023, we published our first ESG Highlights Report as a standalone company. Our ESG Highlights Report highlights the key areas of focus for us in ESG matters, which include IP protection, ethical business practices, employee development, employee engagement and wellbeing, and diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging, each of which are highlighted throughout our ESG Highlights Report. These areas were identified as our key areas of focus on the basis of a months-long materiality assessment conducted in early 2023, whereby we sought to identify those ESG topics that were most important to the Company and to our industry. As a result, we also identified that given our business structure and IP portfolio, environmental matters were unlikely to have a material impact on our business and have excluded such matters from our reporting.

Workforce & Board Diversity

We have demonstrated support and commitment to developing a culture of non-discrimination and embracing diversity and inclusion throughout our workforce. To that end, we fully comply with the board diversity requirements defined in Nasdaq Rule 5606, as demonstrated below.

Board Nominees

(1) Includes board service with legacy Xperi Holding Corporation.

Paul E. Davis is our Chief Executive Officer and has served as a member of our Board since the Separation in October of 2022. Prior to the Separation, Mr. Davis served as the Chief Legal Officer and President of the IP Licensing business. Mr. Davis also served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Xperi Corporation, the predecessor to Xperi Holding Corporation, prior to the merger with TiVo Corporation in 2020. Mr. Davis joined the Company in 2011 and in 2013 was promoted to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Tessera Technologies, Inc., the predecessor to Xperi Corporation before the acquisition of DTS, Inc. in 2016. Before joining the Company, Mr. Davis was an attorney at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, where his practice focused on mergers and acquisitions, corporate securities matters and corporate governance. Mr. Davis holds a B.A. in history and political science from the University of California, San Diego and a J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of Law. The Board believes that Mr. Davis brings extensive legal, intellectual property, and strategic expertise, given his experience as both a public company executive and an attorney, to his role as a member of the Board.

V. Sue Molina has served as a member of our Board since October 2022 and is the Chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Molina previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of Xperi Corporation from February 2018 to May 2020. Until 2004, Ms. Molina worked in public accounting for 27 years and was a Partner at both Ernst & Young and Deloitte & Touche. While at Deloitte, Ms. Molina was the National Partner in charge of the Initiative for the Retention and Advancement of Women. Ms. Molina holds a B.S. in business administration and an M.A. in accounting from the University of Arizona. The Board believes that Ms. Molina brings extensive public accounting and audit expertise, given her years of experience as a partner at both Ernst & Young and Deloitte & Touche, to her role as a member of the Board.

Daniel Moloney serves as the Chairman of our Board and is a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Moloney has served as a member of our Board since June 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Moloney served as a member of the Board of Directors of TiVo Corporation, the predecessor to Xperi Holding Corporation, from September 2013 to June 2020. Mr. Moloney is also an Executive Advisor at Siris Capital, LLC, a leading private equity firm in the technology and telecommunications industries, having spent the prior 8 years with Siris as an Executive Partner. Prior to Siris, Mr. Moloney served as the President of Motorola Mobility, Inc., a leading provider of innovative technologies, products and services for the mobile and cable/wireline industries. Mr. Moloney has almost 30 years of senior executive management, leadership and technological expertise and experience. Prior to Motorola Mobility being spun out of Motorola in early 2011, Mr. Moloney served as the President of the Home & Networks Mobility business within Motorola and from 2002 to 2006, where he led the Connected Home business for Motorola. Mr. Moloney joined Motorola as part of their acquisition of General Instrument in 2000, where he served in various leadership roles. Mr. Moloney holds a B.A. in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. The Board believes that Mr. Moloney brings extensive senior executive management, strategic and operational oversight, technological expertise and experience in telecommunications, technology and technology-enabled business service industries, to his role as a member of the Board.

Tonia O’Connor serves as a member of our Board and is the Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. O’Connor has served as a member of our Board since December 2021. Ms. O’Connor was most recently the Chief Executive Officer of Tone It Up, a plant based, nutritional products company, a position she held from 2021 to 2023. Prior to joining Tone It Up, Ms. O’Connor served as the CEO of Chopra Global from 2019 to 2021 and the President and Chief Revenue Officer at Univision Communications, Inc. from 2008 to 2018. Prior to Univision, Ms. O’Connor held leadership roles at News Corp’s Gemstar. Ms. O’Connor also currently serves on the board of Betterspace, a privately-held company, Syracuse University’s Board of Trustees, where she is a member of the Athletics, Academic Affairs and Advancement & External Affairs Committees, and the national board of STRIVE, a Harlem-based nonprofit organization. Ms. O’Connor previously served on the boards of fuboTV from 2015 to 2018, GoldieBlox from 2018 to 2020, El Rey Network from 2013 to 2018, and Tone It Up from 2021 to 2023. Ms. O’Connor holds a dual degree from Syracuse University in broadcast journalism from the S.I. Newhouse School and international relations from the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs. The Board believes that Ms. O’Connor brings extensive expertise in executive and financial management and sales and marketing within the broader media and IP industries, to her role as a member of the Board.

Raghavendra Rau serves as a member of our Board and is the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Rau has served as a member of our Board since June 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Rau served as a member of the Board of Directors of TiVo Corporation, the predecessor to Xperi Holding Corporation, from May 2015 to June 2020 and served as Vice Chairman of its Board of Directors beginning in June of 2019. He served as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer of TiVo Corporation from July 2018 to May 2019. Mr. Rau also served as Chief Executive Officer of SeaChange International Inc., a video software technology company, from November 2011 to October 2014 and was a member of its Board of Directors beginning in July 2010. Previously, Mr. Rau held several senior leadership positions with Motorola Inc. from 1992 to 2008, including Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development of Motorola’s Networks & Enterprise business, Senior Vice President of Motorola’s Mobile TV Solutions business, and Corporate Vice President of Motorola’s Marketing and Professional Services. Mr. Rau also previously served as a director of Quantum Corp., a storage, archive and data protection company. Mr. Rau holds a Bachelor's degree in engineering from the National Institute of Technology, India and an M.B.A. from the Indian Institute of Management, India. The Board believes that Mr. Rau brings extensive senior management, marketing, business development and strategic experience in the digital video, content, technology and telecommunications industries to his role as a member of the Board.

Adam Rymer serves as a member of our Board and is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Rymer has served as a member of our Board since August 2023. Mr. Rymer is currently the President of Reason Advisory, a consultancy firm focused on the media, entertainment and technology sectors. The firm conducts extensive work on the future of consumer behavior, evolving business models and technology adoption. Prior to Reason Advisory, Mr. Rymer was the Chief Executive Officer of OpTic Gaming/Envy Gaming, where he was responsible for the company’s growth strategy from a leading global gaming and lifestyle organization into an industry leading media and entertainment platform. Prior to OpTic he was the President of Legendary Entertainment's Digital Networks Group. He was also the Co-Founder, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Lava Bear Films, a film financing and production company. Mr. Rymer began his career in the film industry with Universal Studios Motion Picture Group, where he held multiple roles including Senior Vice President of Digital Platforms. In this role, he set the strategic direction across new and emerging platforms including mobile, streaming and digital cinema. Mr. Rymer was also Vice President of Strategic Planning & Business Development, where he was responsible for corporate level financial and strategic analysis across all domestic and international divisions of Universal Pictures. Mr. Rymer graduated from The Wharton School with a Master of Business Administration and Harvard University with a Bachelor of Arts in applied mathematics and economics. The Board believes that Mr. Rymer brings extensive executive management, leadership and strategic experience in the media, technology and entertainment industries to his role as a member of the Board.

Phyllis Turner-Brim serves as a member of our Board and is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Turner-Brim has served as a member of our Board since November 2023. Ms. Turner-Brim is currently Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Products, Services and Brand Security at HP Inc. (“HP”) where she leads legal for HP’s Personal Systems, Print, Workforce Solutions, 3D Print and Incubation business units. Ms. Turner-Brim previously served as HP’s Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Innovation and Brand Protection, where she led HP’s global intellectual property function, including IP sales and licensing, patent development, strategy, enforcement and anti-counterfeiting. Prior to HP, Ms. Turner-Brim was the Vice President, Assistant General Counsel for Starbucks, where she was the legal executive at the intersection of IP and technology. Prior to Starbucks, she was Vice President, Chief IP Counsel for Intellectual Ventures where she led legal teams responsible for outbound licensing, strategic patent prosecution, patent acquisitions/divestitures and IP policy initiatives. She has held similar roles with Intermec Technologies Corp. (now Honeywell), Walmart Stores Inc., and Cabot Microelectronics Corp. Ms. Turner-Brim graduated from the University of Cincinnati with a Juris Doctor degree and the Illinois Institute of Technology with a Bachelor of Science degree in chemical engineering. She is admitted to practice in Texas, Washington, Illinois and before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Board believes that Ms. Turner-Brim brings extensive legal, intellectual property and management expertise, given her experience as both a public company executive and an attorney, to her role as a member of the Board.

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has nominated the seven (7) individuals identified under “Director Nominees” below for election as directors, all of whom are currently directors of the Company. Each of the nominees has agreed to be named in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. Our Board is currently comprised of seven (7) members. Directors are elected at each annual meeting and hold office until their successors are duly elected and qualified at the next annual meeting. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the persons named as proxy holders in the accompanying proxy intend to vote in favor of the election of the seven (7) nominees designated below to serve until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

REQUIRED VOTE AND BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (Bylaws) provide that, in an uncontested election, each director will be elected by a majority of votes cast. A “majority of votes cast” means the number of shares voted “for” a director exceeds the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Our Bylaws further provide that in a contested election, each director will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, which means that the nominees receiving the largest number of affirmative votes will be elected.

The Board recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the election of each of Paul E. Davis, V. Sue Molina, Daniel Moloney, Tonia O’Connor, Raghavendra Rau, Adam Rymer and Phyllis Turner-Brim.

GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY

Pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Company’s Bylaws, our business, property and other affairs are managed by or under the direction of the Board and its committees. Members of the Board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Chief Executive Officer and other officers and advisors, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.

BOARD ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance and enhance stockholder value. Risk management includes not only understanding company specific risks and the steps management implements to manage those risks, but also what level of risk is acceptable and appropriate for the Company. Management is responsible for establishing our business strategy, identifying and assessing the related risks and implementing appropriate risk management practices. Our Board reviews our business strategy and management’s assessment of the related risk, and discusses with management the appropriate level of risk for the Company. For example, the Board annually reviews management’s enterprise risk management assessment, which is designed to (1) identify risks that can negatively impact the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives; (2) estimate the magnitude of the potential risks; and (3) determine approaches to mitigate the identified risks. In addition, the Board, during the Company’s quarterly Board meetings, advises and directs management with respect to strategic business risks, litigation risks, and risks related to the Company’s acquisition strategy, among others. The Board also delegates oversight to Board committees to oversee selected elements of risk.

The Audit Committee of the Board (“Audit Committee”) oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting, and the independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee receives periodic internal controls and related assessments from the Company’s finance department, internal audit function and an annual attestation report on internal control over financial reporting from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to compliance matters and meets at least quarterly with our finance department, internal auditor, independent registered public accounting firm and internal or external legal counsel to discuss risks related to our financial reporting function. In addition, the Audit Committee ensures that the Company’s business is conducted with the highest standards of ethical conduct in compliance with applicable laws and regulations by monitoring our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy and our Corporate Compliance Hotline. The Audit Committee also discusses other risk assessment and risk management policies of the Company periodically with management, including the Audit Committee’s oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity risk. To that end, the Audit Committee periodically meets with and receives reports and updates from business personnel responsible for overseeing cybersecurity risk management and response planning as part of its regular risk assessment and monitoring procedures.

The Compensation Committee participates in the design of compensation structures that avoid creating incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking behavior inconsistent with the Company’s business strategy, as is further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Risk Management sections below.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (“Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) oversees governance-related risks by working with management to establish corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and making recommendations regarding director nominees, the determination of director independence, Board leadership structure and membership on Board committees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also evaluates existing directors and the Board as a whole.

BOARD AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD; DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board currently consists of seven (7) persons. Mr. Davis is CEO of the Company. Mssrs. Moloney, Rau and Rymer and Mses. Molina, Turner-Brim and O’Connor are not, and have never been, employees of our Company or any of our subsidiaries.

The Board currently has the following three standing committees, with the following members:

During 2023, the Board held a total of nine (9) meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of Board meetings and total number of meetings of Board committees on which such director served during the time he or she served on the Board or committees.

The Board has determined that all of the Company’s directors nominated for election, other than Mr. Davis, are “independent directors” as such term is defined in applicable Nasdaq corporate governance rules.

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. At the beginning of 2024, we changed the composition of these committees as reflected above. The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed entirely of independent directors in accordance with current Nasdaq listing standards. Furthermore, each member of our Audit Committee meets the enhanced independence standards established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rulemaking of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Board has further determined that Ms. Molina, Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an “Audit Committee Financial Expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, by virtue of her relevant experience listed in her biographical summary provided above in the section entitled “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors.” Copies of our Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee charters and our corporate governance guidelines are available, free of charge, on our website at http://investors.adeia.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview. The Board from time to time may form such other committees as it deems appropriate to further the purposes of the Board.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and reviews the annual audit plan, the results of the independent audit, and the report and recommendations of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has sole authority for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm and to approve any significant non-audit relationship with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviews and determines the scope and roles and responsibilities of the internal audit function. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Ms. Molina, Mr. Rau, and Mr. Rymer. Ms. Molina is the Chair of the Audit Committee and all committee members are financially literate under the Nasdaq standards. During 2023, the Audit Committee held five (5) meetings.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee approves our goals and objectives relevant to compensation, stays informed as to market levels of compensation and, based on evaluations submitted by management, establishes compensation for our executive officers that correspond to our goals and objectives.

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relating to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of these goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee also recommends to our Board compensation levels for the non-employee members of the Board. The Compensation Committee also produces an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement and annual report on Form 10-K. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Moloney, Ms. O’Connor, and Ms. Turner-Brim. Ms. O’Connor is the Chair of the Compensation Committee. During 2023, the Compensation Committee held five (5) meetings.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to our Board individuals to be nominated as directors and committee members. This includes evaluation of new candidates as well as evaluation of current directors. In evaluating the current directors the committee conducted a thorough self-evaluation process, which included the use of questionnaires. This committee is also responsible for developing and recommending to the Board our corporate governance guidelines, as well as reviewing and recommending revisions to the guidelines on a regular basis.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Ms. O’Connor, Mr. Rau, and Ms. Turner-Brim. Mr. Rau is the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five (5) meetings.

We are committed to having a diversity of backgrounds, experiences and opinions on our board, while complying with Nasdaq’s board diversity requirements. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a number of the following factors when considering director nominees:

The director qualifications developed to date focus on what the Board believes to be essential competencies to effectively serve on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider the following criteria, among others, in recommending candidates for election to the board:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a Board that can best perpetuate the success of the Company and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is committed to recruiting additional directors to the Board to ensure that it has the necessary diversity of experience to oversee the management of the Company’s business.

Prior to each annual meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected, and whenever there is otherwise a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider incumbent Board members and other well-qualified individuals as potential director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to retain an executive search firm to identify Board candidates, and if so, will identify the search firm and approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms and will specify for the search firm the criteria to use in identifying potential candidates, consistent with the director qualification criteria described above. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review each potential candidate. Management may assist the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in the review process at the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s direction. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will select the candidate or candidates it believes are the most qualified to recommend to the Board for selection as a director nominee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by our stockholders in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter. Such recommendations must be submitted in writing to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, Adeia Inc., 3025 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134, no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which the Company’s proxy statement was mailed or made available to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of stockholders. The recommendations must be accompanied by the following information: the name and address of the nominating stockholder, a representation that the nominating stockholder is a stockholder of record, a representation that the nominating stockholder intends to appear in person (or by virtual attendance) or by proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the person or persons specified, information regarding each nominee that would be required to be included in a proxy statement, a description of any arrangements or understandings between the nominating stockholder and the nominee, and the consent of each nominee to serve as a director, if elected. Candidates recommended by the stockholders are evaluated in the same manner as candidates identified by a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member.

Each of the nominees for election as director at the Annual Meeting is recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and each nominee is presently a director and stands for re-election by the stockholders.

Pursuant to our Bylaws, stockholders who wish to nominate persons for election to the Board at an annual meeting must be a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the notice and at the meeting, must be entitled to vote at the meeting and must comply with the notice provisions in our Bylaws. A stockholder’s notice of nomination to be made at an annual meeting must be delivered to our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting. However, if an annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, the notice must be delivered no later than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or, if later, the 10th day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting was made. A stockholder’s notice of nomination to be made at a special meeting at which the election of directors is a matter specified in the notice of meeting must be delivered to our principal executive offices not earlier than the 120th day prior to and not later than the 90th day prior to such special meeting or, if later, the 10th day following the day on which first public announcement of the date of such special meeting was made. The stockholder’s notice must include the following information for the person making the nomination:

The stockholder’s notice must also include the following information for each proposed director nominee:

The stockholder’s notice must be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information required to be provided in the notice is true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten business days prior to the meeting.

The chair of the meeting will determine if the procedures in the Bylaws have been followed, and if not, declare that the nomination be disregarded. The nominee must be willing to provide any other information reasonably requested by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with its evaluation of the nominee’s independence.

In addition to satisfying all of the requirements under our Bylaws, any stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the company’s nominees at the next annual meeting must also comply with all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act. The advance notice requirement under Rule 14a-19 does not override or supersede the longer advance notice requirement under our Bylaws. For additional information, see “Stockholder Proposals for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

Other Committees

Our Board may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT ANNUAL MEETINGS

Stockholders may send correspondence to the Board or any member of the Board, c/o the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address set forth above. The Corporate Secretary will review all correspondence addressed to the Board, or any individual Board member, for any inappropriate correspondence and correspondence more suitably directed to management. However, the Corporate Secretary will summarize all correspondence not forwarded to the Board and make the correspondence available to the Board for its review at the Board’s request. The Corporate Secretary will forward stockholder communications to the Board prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board following the receipt of the communication.

Directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All members of the Board who were then in office attended our last Annual Meeting in May 2023.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our director compensation policy provides for an annual retainer of $50,000 for our non-employee directors. In addition to our non-employee director annual retainer, our non-executive chairman of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $65,000. In addition, we pay each of our non-employee directors the following annual retainers for their service as a member, or chair, as applicable, of our Board committees:

All Board and committee retainers are paid in equal quarterly installments over the course of each year of a director’s service on the Board or applicable committee. We also reimburse all non-employee directors for reasonable expenses related to our Board or committee meetings. Annually, each of our non-employee directors receives RSUs under our stockholder-approved equity plan. The number of shares of common stock subject to the RSU award is determined by dividing (1) $190,000 by (2) the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant.

A non-employee director who is initially appointed after any annual meeting of stockholders will receive a RSU award on the date of his or her initial appointment to the Board equal to the pro-rated amount of the annual grant.

Annual RSU awards (or any pro-rated grants for directors initially appointed between annual meetings) vest on the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of stockholders.

The following table shows compensation information for our non-employee directors for 2023, including those directors who were initially appointed to our Board after our last annual meeting of stockholders in May 2023.

2023 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

(1) The amounts in this column represent annual cash retainers, including additional annual cash retainers for service as a member, or chair, as applicable, of our Board committees.

(2) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted to our non-employee directors in 2023, measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures, and do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from these awards. For the methodology of how the aggregate grant date fair value amount is calculated, please see Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2024. The aggregate number of shares subject to unvested RSU awards outstanding for each non-employee director at December 31, 2023 was: Ms. Molina: 20,320; Mr. Moloney: 20,320; Ms. O’Connor: 20,320; Mr. Rau: 20,320; Mr. Rymer: 15,010 and Ms. Turner-Brim: 11,460.

(3) Mr. Rymer joined the Board on August 4, 2023 and received a pro rata amount of director compensation, including a RSU award on August 9, 2023 equal to the pro-rated amount of the annual grant.

(4) Ms. Turner-Brim joined the Board on November 3, 2023 and received a pro rata amount of director compensation, including a RSU award on November 8, 2023 equal to the pro-rated amount of the annual grant.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below are the name, age and position of each of our executive officers as of March 27, 2024.

The following are biographical summaries of our executive officers other than Mr. Davis, for whom a biographical summary is set forth under “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors”.

Keith A. Jones is our Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company in 2022, Mr. Jones served as Vice President of Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer at Rambus where he was responsible for the company’s global finance organization, including financial management, planning, tax, treasury, controls, and reporting. Prior to that, Mr. Jones also served as Chief Accounting Officer, Corporate Controller and Vice President of Finance at Rambus. Before joining Rambus in February of 2018, Mr. Jones served as World-Wide Corporate Controller, Vice President of Finance and the Principal Accounting Officer at ShoreTel Inc., prior to its acquisition by Mitel Networks Corporation, from January 2011 until February 2018. At ShoreTel, Keith oversaw the reporting, controls and treasury-related activities of the company. Before joining ShoreTel, Mr. Jones served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance at PDF Solutions, Inc., from July 2003 until March 2010, where he oversaw the overall financial management of the company, including planning, tax, treasury, controls, reporting and M&A related activities. Prior to joining PDF Solutions, Mr. Jones served in senior leadership positions at Interwoven, Inc. from September 2001 until July 2003 and e-Time Capital, Inc. from April 2000 until July 2001. Mr. Jones started his career serving as an Audit Manager with Deloitte & Touche LLP from July 1994 until April 2000. Mr. Jones holds a B.S. in business administration with a concentration in accounting California State University, Fresno.

Kevin Tanji is our Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary. Prior to the Separation of our product business on October 1, 2022, Mr. Tanji served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel, IP, where he was the head of legal for our IP business. Mr. Tanji served as Senior Vice President, Commercial Legal Affairs of TiVo Corporation, the predecessor to Xperi Holding Corporation, from 2016 to 2020, where he was the head of commercial legal affairs. From 2010 until 2016, Mr. Tanji served as Director, Commercial Legal Affairs of Rovi Corporation. Prior to 2010, Mr. Tanji was a corporate finance attorney at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Mr. Tanji holds a B.S. in biology, summa cum laude with departmental highest honors, from University of California, Los Angeles and a J.D. from University of California, Berkeley.

Dr. Mark Kokes is our Chief Licensing Officer and General Manager, Media. Prior to joining the Company as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Media in 2021, Dr. Kokes held the position of Chief Intellectual Property Officer for NantWorks and the Nant family of companies, a large healthcare conglomerate based in Los Angeles, California. Preceding NantWorks, Dr. Kokes was promoted to the role of Senior Vice President of Intellectual Property, Licensing and Standards at BlackBerry where he was responsible for the monetization of its aggregate intellectual property portfolio as well as BlackBerry’s numerous research and technology standardization efforts. Prior to joining BlackBerry in late 2014, Dr. Kokes held the position of Vice President of Corporate Development and Intellectual Property Licensing at Intertrust Technologies Corporation, a licensor of technology and intellectual property in the area of trusted distributed computing and cybersecurity. Dr. Kokes is a 15-year veteran of the mobile industry. Preceding his time at Intertrust, Dr. Kokes held a series of senior engineering, corporate strategy and intellectual property related positions at Nokia Research Center, Sony Ericsson’s Corporate Technology Office and HTC’s Corporate Strategy Group. Dr Kokes is an inventor on 14 US and international patents, has co-authored several additional international patent applications and has published many academic articles and book chapters on various research topics. Dr. Kokes holds a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, as well as both a M.S. and B.S., summa cum laude, from Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas.

Dana Escobar is our Chief Licensing Officer and General Manager, Semiconductor. Prior to the Separation, Mr. Escobar served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Semiconductor IP at Xperi Holding Corporation. Mr. Escobar joined the Company in 2020 as Vice President of IP Licensing. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Escobar was Vice President of IP Licensing at GE, Chief IP Counsel at Sharp Laboratories of America and Director of Sharp Corporation’s U.S. IP Center, Senior Director of IP Licensing at LSI Corporation/Avago, Licensing & Litigation Attorney at Discovision Associates and a Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles County. Mr. Escobar holds a J.D. from the University of California Los Angeles, School of Law and a B.A. degree in political science from the University of California, Los Angeles.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of the record date, March 13, 2024, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by (i) each person who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each director and each director nominee, (iii) each named executive officer, and (iv) all current directors, nominees and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each listed person or entity includes common stock underlying options held by the person or entity that are exercisable within 60 days of March 13, 2024, and common stock underlying RSUs held by the person or entity that will vest within 60 days of March 13, 2024, but excludes common stock underlying options and RSUs held by any other person or entity. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 108,452,822 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 13, 2024. The address for all our current directors and executive officers is c/o Adeia Inc., 3025 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, California 95134.

*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock

(1) The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 50 Hudson Yards, New York, New York 10001. Black Rock, Inc. has sole voting power as to 17,579,923 shares and sole dispositive power as to 17,579,923 shares. The information in this table and footnote is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 22, 2024 by Black Rock, Inc.

(2) The address for Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA, 19355. Vanguard Group, Inc. has shared voting power as to 252,736 shares, sole dispositive power as to 13,621,489 shares and shared dispositive power as to 363,612 shares. The information in this table and footnote is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 by Vanguard Group, Inc.

(3) The address for Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“AFI”) is 145 Ameriprise Financial Center, Minneapolis, MN 55474. AFI has shared voting power as to 12,581,895 shares and shared dispositive power as to 13,432,165 shares. Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (“CMIA”) has shared voting power as to 12,581,895 shares and shared dispositive power as to 12,832,969 shares. Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund (“Fund”) has sole voting power and shared dispositive power as to 7,375,506 shares. CMIA and AFI do not directly own any shares of common stock. CMIA is the investment adviser to the Fund. AFI is the parent holding company of CMIA. CMIA and AFI do not directly own any shares of common stock. As the investment adviser to the Fund, CMIA may be deemed to beneficially own the shares reported herein by the accounts. As the parent holding company of CMIA, AFI may be deemed to beneficially own the shares reported herein by the accounts. Each of CMIA and AFI disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares reported herein. The information in this table and footnote is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024 by Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

(4) Includes 20,320 RSUs that vest within 60 days of the record date.

(5) Includes 15,010 RSUs that vest within 60 days of the record date.

(6) Includes 11,460 RSUs that vest within 60 days of the record date.

(7) Includes 5,000 RSUs that vest within 60 days of the record date.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding the Company’s performance targets and goals used in setting compensation for our named executive officers, or “NEOs.” These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of the Company’s compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management’s future expectations or estimates of future results or other guidance. The Company specifically cautions investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, objectives and programs, as well as the compensation-related actions taken in 2023 with respect to our NEOs. Our NEOs for 2023 are identified as follows:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We have designed our executive compensation program to pay and reward our executive officers, including oue NEOs, in alignment with the overall strategic and financial performance of the Company, with the ultimate goal of building long-term stockholder value. We construct our compensation packages to provide remuneration sufficient to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers to exert their best efforts in the highly competitive, media and semiconductor IP licensing environments in which we operate. The compensation of our NEOs is comprised of base salaries, annual performance-based cash incentives, and long-term incentives delivered in the form of equity awards that are earned over a multi-year period. Our approach to short-term incentive compensation is to pay for current results and strategic actions taken that are expected to translate into improved future financial performance. Combined with our emphasis on long-term equity awards, we believe this approach appropriately motivates, rewards and retains our executive officers, while providing strong alignment with our stockholders. We hold our executive officers to stringent performance standards and, as a result, our executive compensation plans are designed to pay competitively if strategic and financial performance objectives are met and less so if variable pay metrics are not met.

The Compensation Committee has established the following set of objectives for our executive compensation program:

2023 Executive Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program plays an important role in attracting, retaining and rewarding individuals with the ability and vision to lead our business, drive our long-term success and deliver stockholder value.

Compensation of Chief Executive Officer

The compensation package for Mr. Davis reflects both the market value of his role and his expertise and domain knowledge in broad IP and technology licensing. We believe this market competitive compensation package and structure aligns Mr. Davis’ interests with our stockholders in the pursuit of long term-value creation.

The chart below illustrates the mix of the target total direct compensation for Mr. Davis in 2023 and its heavy weighting towards “at-risk” and long-term pay incentives.

CEO 2023 Target Compensation

The graphic above includes Mr. Davis’ annualized base salary and annual bonus for 2023. The long-term incentive compensation percentage is based on the grant date fair value of the underlying equity awards (at target, in the case of PSU awards) and does not represent the compensation actually realized or currently realizable by him from such awards. The RSUs vest in four equal installments upon completion of each year of service over a four-year period. The PSUs are earned and vest after three years based upon the achievement of a three-year stock price appreciation target along with a relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) modifier, and long-term revenue performance, with each being weighted 50%.

Pay-for-Performance – Our annual performance-based cash incentive plan is structured to only pay when rigorous financial, business and strategic goals are achieved. Despite having success in a number of areas in our business, we did not meet the overall financial targets established for 2023. As a result, the annual cash incentive payments to our NEOs were funded at less than 93% of target as described in the “annual performance-based cash incentive bonuses” section below.

Summary of Certain Executive Compensation Practices

We endeavor to maintain sound corporate governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. We have adopted the following policies and practices with respect to the executive compensation program in which our NEOs participate:

COMPENSATION-SETTING PROCESS

The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation program. In designing and implementing the various components of our 2023 executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considered market and industry practices and trends and input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and management, as well as the impact of our compensation program on our financial results. While the Compensation Committee considers all factors in its deliberations, it places no formal weighting on any one factor.

The Compensation Committee retained Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, to assist it in the determination of the key elements of our executive compensation program. See discussion in the “Setting Executive Compensation” section below for a discussion regarding the 2023 compensation peer group. Compensia provided advice to the Compensation Committee with respect to competitive practices and the amounts and nature of compensation paid to executive officers in similar organizations. Compensia also advised on, among other things, structuring our various compensation programs and understanding competitive levels of base salary, annual performance-based cash incentive compensation and other long-term incentive compensation payable to our executive officers. Compensia reports to and is accountable to the Compensation Committee and may not conduct any other work for us without the authorization of the Compensation Committee. Compensia did not provide any services to us in 2023 beyond its engagement as an advisor to the Compensation Committee on executive and Board compensation matters. After review and consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee has determined that Compensia is independent and there is no conflict of interest resulting from retaining Compensia currently or during the year ended December 31, 2023. In reaching these conclusions, the Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and Nasdaq listing standards.

To aid the Compensation Committee in making its 2023 compensation determinations, our CEO, provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of all executive officers, excluding himself. Each NEO other than our CEO, in turn, participated in an annual performance review with our CEO to provide input about their contributions to our success for the period being assessed. The Compensation Committee gathered data on our CEO’s performance through several channels, including qualitative and quantitative assessments of the Company’s performance, discussions with other members of the management team and discussions with other members of our Board. Each Compensation Committee meeting ordinarily includes an executive session without members of our management team present.

For purposes of our annual and long-term incentive compensation programs, corporate performance goals for 2023 awards were based on the Company’s 2023 financial plan as approved by our Board. Our CEO, after discussions with the management team, then recommended a subset of these goals to the Compensation Committee as the corporate performance goals underlying our annual performance-based cash incentive plan and performance-based equity awards. We believe that the achievement of these performance goals is based on the successful efforts and contributions of our NEOs. As described below, the Compensation Committee retains the authority under our annual performance-based cash incentive plan to authorize bonus payments to our NEOs that are less than the bonus payments that would otherwise be awarded based on our achievement of the performance goals established for the plan.

Setting Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews competitive compensation practices and the financial performance of comparable companies, typically, at least annually. This analysis provides the necessary background to the Compensation Committee to ensure that compensation opportunities for our executive officers are competitive with compensation practices among comparable companies and that actual compensation paid to our executive officers is appropriately aligned with our performance in the past year.

Compensia worked with the Compensation Committee to identify a peer group of companies to be used in the competitive assessment of 2023 compensation. The companies comprising the compensation peer group were selected because the Compensation Committee, management and Compensia believed that they are representative of the type of companies which we may compete with for executive talent. In selecting peer companies, we used a number of targeted criteria designed to reflect our business structure. Given the limited number of directly comparable companies from a business perspective, the criteria were expanded in some cases to include companies that the Compensation Committee considered to be a close fit in terms of business focus and/or with which we might compete for executive talent. As a result, some companies may not satisfy all of the selection criteria. Our compensation peer group is based on the following criteria:

Although we maintain the compensation peer group for executive compensation and performance reference purposes, the peer group compensation data is limited to publicly available information and therefore does not necessarily provide comparisons for all executive officers. In contrast, broad executive compensation survey data has the advantage of including data on executive positions beyond what is available in public filings, but may not be specific to the selected companies in the peer group. In light of this, the Compensation Committee also reviewed data from the Radford Executive Survey, filtered to public companies in the U.S. primarily from technology industries with revenues between $100 million and $1.5 billion for our NEOs (other than our CEO and CFO). With respect to the survey data presented to the Compensation Committee, the identities of the 219 individual companies included in the specified survey cut were not provided to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee did not refer to individual compensation information for such companies.

We believe that by utilizing both publicly available peer group data and the survey data from the published surveys in which we participate, we are able to develop the best set of robust competitive data reasonably available for use in making compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee, when making compensation adjustments for our NEOs, reviews the publicly available peer group data and the survey data to ensure that, following any compensation adjustment, the total compensation of NEOs falls within the Company’s guidelines.

Based on the objectives outlined above, the Compensation Committee strives to set target total direct compensation opportunities at competitive levels for the markets in which we compete for executive talent and that are appropriate for the skills, experience and performance of each individual. However, the Compensation Committee does not establish compensation levels based solely on benchmarking. The Compensation Committee also relies on the judgment of its members in making compensation decisions regarding base salaries, target annual cash incentive opportunities and long-term equity incentive awards after reviewing our performance and carefully evaluating each NEO’s performance during the year, leadership qualities, business responsibilities, tenure with the Company, current compensation arrangements and long-term potential to enhance stockholder value. The Compensation Committee does not guarantee that any NEO will receive a specific market-derived compensation level.

In addition, the Compensation Committee has taken the approach of determining the mix of compensation elements, such as base salary, target annual cash incentive opportunities and equity awards, on an individual basis. The Compensation Committee allocates target total direct compensation between cash and equity compensation based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including competitive practices among the comparable companies, the role and responsibilities of the individual executive officer, and the nature of the behaviors the incentives are intended to motivate. The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is to balance compensation between long-term and short-term compensation, cash and non-cash compensation, and to take into account the roles and responsibilities of the individual executive officer.

Impact of 2023 “Say-on-Pay” Vote

We held our most recent “say-on-pay” vote in 2023 and over 94% of the votes cast on such proposal were voted in favor of the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee will continue to take into account future stockholder advisory votes on named executive officer compensation and other relevant market developments affecting executive officer compensation in order to determine whether any subsequent changes to our executive compensation program and policies are warranted to reflect stockholder concerns or to address market developments.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

The graphic below includes the components of the NEOs’ 2023 target total direct compensation.

Base Salary

The base salary for each executive officer, including each NEO, is initially established through negotiation at the time the individual is hired or promoted into such role, taking into account the Company’s needs, the executive’s qualifications, experience, an analysis of competitive market data, overall compensation arrangements, internal equity and relevant survey data. In determining whether to make subsequent adjustments to the base salaries of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviews information regarding compensation paid to individuals holding comparable positions at our peer group companies, as well as relevant market data from the applicable Radford Executive Compensation survey. In addition, the Compensation Committee determines whether to approve increases to our executive officers’ base salaries based upon the Company’s performance, their individual performance in accomplishing functional or team goals, changes in duties and responsibilities and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary). No formulaic or guaranteed base salary increases are provided to our NEOs. In 2023, the Compensation Committee did not set the various components of executive compensation at a certain target percentiles within our compensation peer group. The base salary of each executive officer for 2023 is generally competitive with the peer and survey salary data reviewed by the Compensation Committee.

The actual base salaries paid to our NEOs during 2023 are set forth in the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan

Our executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to receive an annual performance-based cash incentive bonus, which we refer to as our MBO Plan. The target and maximum annual cash incentive opportunities for our NEOs participating expressed as a percentage of base salary, were as follows:

Participants may receive a smaller award (or no award) if we do not achieve a target level of performance and a larger award (capped at a level that provides our executive officers an opportunity to earn larger awards by exceeding performance objectives based on the multiplier discussed below) if we exceed the target level of performance. Payments of above-target bonuses may be made in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, only if we exceed our corporate financial objectives.

Performance Goals

Bonuses paid to our NEOs under our 2023 MBO Plan were based on our achievement of specific pre-established corporate performance goals and upon an evaluation of the individual executive officer’s performance for their efforts tied to such goals for the year. The corporate performance goals for 2023 were a combination of financial goals (related to revenue and Non-GAAP operating margin) and strategic and business goals that are all directly supportive of our short-term and long-term strategic plans. The weighted goal categories for 2023 for each NEO are set forth below:

(1) The revenue goal was based on achieving the midpoint of our revenue guidance for the Company. For more information on the revenue goal of the 2023 MBO Plan, see the sections entitled “2023 Revenue Goal and Achievement” below.

(2) We define Non-GAAP operating margin as GAAP operating margin adjusted for one-time or ongoing non-cash acquired intangibles amortization charges, costs related to actual or planned business combinations including transaction fees, integration costs, severance, facility closures, and retention bonuses, separation costs, all forms of stock-based compensation, loss on debt extinguishment, expensed debt refinancing costs, impairment of intangible assets, impact of certain foreign currency adjustments, discontinued operations and related tax effects.

2023 Revenue Goal and Achievement

Set forth below is the Company’s revenue goal (with linear interpolation), as well as the Company’s actual results for such goal, for purposes of the 2023 MBO Plan.

(1) The Compensation Committee approved 59.5% achievement of the Company’s revenue goal based on linear interpolation between 0% at $365 million and 100% at $405 million.

2023 Non-GAAP Operating Margin Goal and Achievement

Set forth below is the Company’s operating margin goal (with linear interpolation between achievement levels, as well as the Company’s actual results for such goal, for purposes of the 2023 MBO Plan.

2023 Strategic and Business Goals and Achievement

Set forth below are the strategic and business goals for purposes of the 2023 MBO Plan. The evaluation of each NEO’s individual performance under the 2023 MBO Plan was based on an evaluation of the individual officer’s efforts tied to these goals.

2023 Annual Performance-based Cash Incentive Plan

The annual performance-based cash incentive bonuses under the 2023 MBO Plan paid to our NEOs were calculated as follows:

Long-Term Compensation

Our long-term equity incentive compensation program is intended to provide our executive officers, including our NEOs, with opportunities to participate in the appreciation of our stock price and to create equity award value that will provide a financial incentive for our executive officers to remain with and work for the continued success of the Company.

Our long-term equity incentive award program is generally comprised of two equity award vehicles, although the mix of such awards granted by the Compensation Committee to our NEOs may vary from year to year based on the Compensation Committee’s determinations regarding the appropriate incentives for such year:

2023 Equity Awards

The Compensation Committee determined that the annual equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2023 should consist of time-vesting RSU awards and PSU awards as set forth in the table below. The Compensation Committee determined that these two types of equity awards provided the appropriate balance of long-term incentives for our executive officers in 2023.

In setting the mix of the two types of equity awards for 2023, the Compensation Committee determined that a substantial portion of the equity awards should consist of awards that vest based on our performance, in the form of stock price appreciation and long-term revenue performance. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee structured performance-based awards to account for 60% of our CEO’s annual equity awards and 50% of all other NEOs’ annual equity awards.

Target award values were established based on an analysis of competitive market data, individual performance and criticality and the retention value of existing equity awards. The Compensation Committee believes that the award values, combined with its mix of equity compensation vehicles, reflects our commitment to pay for performance, with resulting compensation above the median of our peers for performance that exceeds target goals and compensation below the median of our peers if our performance goals are not achieved.

The Compensation Committee approved a total target dollar value for each NEO’s annual equity awards, which we refer to as the grant date target value. These grant date target values are based on the analysis of competitive market data and other factors described above, and the allocation of such value to each of the two forms of equity awards is a 60%/40% mix of PSUs and RSUs for our CEO and a 50%/50% mix of PSUs and RSUs for all other NEOs. The actual number of PSUs and RSUs granted on March 1, 2023 was calculated using the 90-day average stock price preceding the grant date (dividing the applicable grant date target value by such stock price average to arrive at the target number of PSUs and the number of RSUs).

The following awards were granted in 2023 to our NEOs:

(1) The equity awards to Keith A. Jones includes PSUs tied to his new hire offer in 2022, which was delayed in order to establish PSU goals post-Separation and in conjunction with all other executive officer awards.

2023 PSU Award Vesting Criteria

The 2023 PSU awards were structured to be based entirely on a three-year performance period and are eligible to be earned and vest on a “cliff basis”, if at all, on the third anniversary of the grant date based upon the achievement of a three-year stock price appreciation target along with a relative TSR modifier and long-term revenue performance, with each being weighted 50%, as reflected below. the Compensation Committee carefully set the PSU award performance goals to be rigorous and ultimately to align management and our stockholders’ interests. The target was set at a level the Compensation Committee determined to be competitively challenging, with the maximum metric requiring a higher level of performance. Further, the earning and vesting of the performance awards is conditioned upon the recipient remaining employed with the Company through the vesting date.

The Compensation Committee structured the stock appreciation goal, TSR modifier and revenue target to be based on a three-year measurement period, to enhance the long-term nature of the award and therefore incentivize sustained stock price performance, distinguish long-term incentive award and short-term incentive award goals and further align the interests of our executive officers with our long-term stockholder interests.

The range of threshold, target and maximum levels (with linear interpolation between levels) for the three-year stock price performance and resulting vesting are as follows:

The stock price appreciation targets are based on the appreciation of our 90-day average stock price preceding the date of grant, which was $10.77 per share. The performance metric is based on the highest 30-day average price in the last six months of the three-year performance period.

The relative TSR assessment uses the Russell 2000 Index as the benchmark and it will be calculated over the same three-year performance period and will adjust the final payout by +/-20%. The relative TSR performance is to be determined using our 90-trading-day average stock price prior to both the beginning and the ending of the performance period. Any payout will be limited to 100% if our absolute TSR is negative.

Payout modifier levels range from 80% to 120% (with linear interpolation) for our relative TSR percentile rank ranging from the 25th to the 75th percentiles as summarized in the following table.

The range of threshold, target, and maximum levels (with linear interpolation) for the three-year long-term revenue performance and resulting vesting are as follows:

At the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine the level of achievement of revenue performance and the stock price appreciation as well as the relative TSR achievement for the three-year performance period and then apply the resulting vesting factor to the award amount to determine the total amount that will be considered earned and vested. Depending on the level of achievement, no shares will be issuable if performance is below the threshold performance level and twice the number of target number of shares will be issuable if the maximum performance level is achieved.

Shares will vest upon the Compensation Committee’s certification of our revenue and stock price performance and relative TSR at the end of the performance period subject to each participant’s continued employment or consulting relationship with the Company through the end of the performance period.

2020 PSU – Forfeited

The 2020 PSU awards granted on July 28, 2020 were based entirely on a three-year performance period and were eligible to vest on a cliff basis, if at all, on July 28, 2023 based upon the achievement of a three-year stock price appreciation target along with a relative TSR modifier. The target was set at a level the Compensation Committee determined to be competitively challenging. On July 26, 2023, the Compensation Committee certified the level of achievement of the 2020 PSU awards and determined that no shares were issuable in respect of the 2020 PSU awards, and the 2020 PSU awards were forfeited.

Other Compensation

Employee Benefits

We maintain a Section 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) to cover eligible employees of the Company and any designated affiliate in the U.S., including our NEOs. The 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees to defer up to the maximum dollar amount allowed by law. The employees’ elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) Plan. We currently make discretionary matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to a maximum of 3% of the participant’s eligible annual compensation and subject to certain other limits. Employer contributions to the 401(k) Plan are vested at 100%.

In addition, our executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group life and disability insurance, in each case on the same basis as other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including our executive officers.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Our executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group life and disability insurance, in each case on the same basis as other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including our executive officers. Executive officers have access to an elective annual executive physical. Other than as described in this section, we generally do not provide any special perquisites to our executive officers that are not available to all of our employees.

POST-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Consistent with our practice before the Separation, we have entered into change in control severance agreements with our executive officers, including our NEOs, to provide appropriate post-employment compensation arrangements in the event of certain terminations of employment, including in connection with a change in control of the Company. The Compensation Committee believes these types of agreements are essential in order to attract and retain qualified executive officers and promote stability and continuity in our senior management team. We believe that the stability and continuity provided by these agreements are in the best interests of our stockholders. For details, including an estimate of the amounts payable to our NEOs under their change in control severance agreements see “Termination of Employment Arrangements and Change in Control Arrangements” below.

OTHER COMPENSATION RELATED POLICIES

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain stock ownership guidelines that apply to our (a) CEO, each other executive officer of the Company within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f) and each other employee who reports directly to our CEO (each, an “Executive”) and (b) all non-employee members of the Board (each, a “Non-Employee Director”). Subject to a five-year grace period from the time he or she becomes an Executive, each Executive will be expected to own shares of our common stock with a market value equal to the following amounts for as long as he or she remains an Executive:

Subject to a three-year grace period from the time he or she joins the Board, each Non-Employee Director will be expected to own shares of our common stock with a market value equal to three times (3x) the value of the Non-Employee Director’s annual cash retainer (excluding any annual cash retainer for committee membership or chairmanship) for as long as he or she remains a Non-Employee Director. As of December 31, 2023, all Executives (including our CEO) and Non-Employee Directors were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines or had additional time within which to come into compliance with such guidelines. Unvested PSUs for which actual Company performance has not been certified do not count towards meeting our stock ownership guidelines, whereas unvested RSUs are counted for these purposes.

Insider Trading Policy

Our insider trading policy prohibits directors, executive officers, employees (including full-time employees and part-time employees), temporary workers and consultants of the Company, all persons living in their households and any other person or entity whose securities trading decisions are influenced or controlled by any of the foregoing from trading any type of security, whether issued by the Company or other companies with which we do business, while aware of material non-public information relating to the issuer of the security or from providing such material non-public information to any person who may trade while aware of such information. In addition, we restrict trading by our directors and executive officers, as well as other categories of employees who may be expected in the ordinary course of performing their duties to have access to material non-public information, to specified quarterly trading windows. The Company also reserves the right to enforce a blackout period, and, in its sole discretion, as a result of a major transaction or a significant event which would constitute material nonpublic information. Furthermore, our insider trading policy requires that certain specified individuals meet with representatives of our legal department to confirm that they are not in possession of material non-public information prior to trading any security of the Company during open window periods. Our insider trading policy also prohibits directors, executive officers, employees and all persons living in their households from purchasing Company stock on margin, pledging Company stock to secure margin or other loans, “short selling” Company stock or buying or selling put or call options on Company stock, or entering into other derivative contracts or hedging contracts arrangements.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

Effective as of October 24, 2023, we adopted our Amended and Restated Compensation Recovery Policy (the “Compensation Recovery Policy”) regarding accounting restatements in connection with Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and corresponding Nasdaq listing standards. The Compensation Recovery Policy generally requires recoupment of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation (including any compensation granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure) received by current and former executive officers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10D-1), including our NEOs, during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws.

The Compensation Recovery Policy also applies to incentive-based compensation received during the applicable recovery period by such other key employees of the Company who may from time to time be determined to be deemed subject to the policy by the Compensation Committee (or such other body authorized to administer the policy from time to time).

Derivatives Trading and Hedging Policy

Our insider trading policy prohibits the pledging, trading of derivatives or the hedging of our equity securities by our employees, including our executive officers, and directors. Specifically, they may not, at any time:

Risk Assessment

In March 2023, management of the Company assessed its compensation policies and programs for all employees for purposes of determining the relationship of such policies and programs and the enterprise risks faced by the Company and presented its assessment to the Compensation Committee. Based on its assessment, management recommended, and the Compensation Committee concluded, that none of our compensation policies or programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In connection with their review, the management and the Compensation Committee noted certain key attributes of its compensation programs and policies that help to reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking, which also apply to our executive compensation program, including:

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Deduction Limitation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to a publicly-held company for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its “covered employees” which generally includes all NEOs. While the Compensation Committee considers the tax deductibility of each element of executive compensation as a factor in our overall compensation program as it deems appropriate, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to approve compensation that exceeds deductibility limits if it determines that doing so is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Accounting Treatment

We account for stock-based awards to our employees under the rules of FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires us to record the compensation expense over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.

Termination of Employment Arrangements and Change in Control Arrangements

The Company provides for certain severance payments and benefits if an executive officer’s employment is involuntarily or constructively terminated. In addition, the Company provides enhanced severance payments and benefits if such a termination of employment occurs in connection with a change in control of the Company. Such severance payments and benefits are designed to alleviate the financial impact of an involuntary termination of employment through salary, bonus and health benefit continuation and with the intent of providing for a stable work environment. The Company believes that reasonable severance payments and benefits for those NEOs with whom we have entered into severance agreements are important because it may be difficult for these NEOs to find comparable employment within a short period of time following certain qualifying terminations of employment. The Company also believes these payments and benefits are a means of reinforcing and encouraging the continued attention and dedication of key executive officers of the Company to their duties of employment without personal distraction or a conflict of interest in circumstances which could arise from the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. We believe that the interests of stockholders will be best served if the interests of our executive officers are aligned with them, and providing change in control payments and benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior management to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of our stockholders.

The Company extends change in control payments and benefits because they are essential to help the Company fulfill its objectives of attracting and retaining key managerial talent. These arrangements are intended to be competitive within our industry and company size and are necessary to attract highly qualified individuals and encourage them to remain employed with the Company. In making the decision to extend the payment and benefits, the Compensation Committee relied on data prepared by its independent compensation consultant that the programs are representative of market practice, both in terms of design and cost.

Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Agreement with Mr. Davis

On February 9, 2023, we entered into an amended and restated change in control severance agreement with Mr. Davis, our CEO (the “CEO Severance Agreement”).

The CEO Severance Agreement has an initial term of three years, plus reoccurring one-year automatic renewals. The then-effective term of the CEO Severance Agreement will automatically be extended for 12 months following a change in control of the Company if the term would otherwise have expired during such period.

The CEO Severance Agreement provides that, if Mr. Davis’ employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or if he resigns for “good reason”, in each case, more than three months prior to a change in control or more than 12 months following a change in control, Mr. Davis will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits:

If Mr. Davis’ employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or if he resigns for “good reason”, in each case, within three months prior to a change in control or within twelve months following a change in control, the CEO Severance Agreement provides that Mr. Davis will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits:

The severance payments and benefits (other than the Accrued Obligations) are subject to Mr. Davis’ execution of a general release of claims in favor of the Company and continued compliance with the confidentiality and proprietary rights covenant set forth in the CEO Severance Agreement.

Severance Agreements with the Other Named Executive Officers

On February 9, 2023 the Company entered into severance agreements with each of (i) Keith A. Jones, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer; (ii) Dr. Mark Kokes, the Company’s Chief Licensing Officer & General Manager, Media; (iii) Kevin Tanji, the Company’s Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary; and (iv) Dana Escobar, the Company’s Chief Licensing Officer & General Manager, Semiconductor (collectively, the “NEO Severance Agreements”).

Each of the NEO Severance Agreements has an initial term of three years, plus reoccurring one-year automatic renewals. The then-effective term of the NEO Severance Agreements will automatically be extended for 12 months following a change in control of the Company if the term would otherwise have expired during such period.

Each of the NEO Severance Agreements provide that, if the executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” more than three months prior to a change in control or more than 12 months following a change in control, the executive officer will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits:

If the executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or if the executive officer resigns for “good reason”, in each case, within three months prior to a change in control or within 12 months following a change in control, each NEO Severance Agreement provides that the executive officer will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits:

The severance payments and benefits (other than the Accrued Obligations) are subject to the respective executive officer’s execution of a general release of claims in favor of the Company and continued compliance with the confidentiality and proprietary rights covenant set forth in the NEO Severance Agreement.

Defined Terms Related to CEO Severance Agreement and NEO Severance Agreement

For purposes of the severance agreements, “cause” means, generally, an executive officer’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties, the executive officer’s willful and habitual neglect of or failure to perform his duties, the executive officer’s commission of any material act of fraud, dishonesty or financial or accounting impropriety with respect to our Company which results in a personal benefit to the executive, the executive officer’s failure to cooperate with us in any investigation or formal proceeding initiated by a governmental authority or otherwise approved by our Board or the Audit Committee of the Board, the executive officer’s conviction of or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to felony criminal conduct (other than moving vehicle violations), the executive officer’s material violation of our confidentiality and proprietary rights agreement or any similar agreement with the Company, or the executive officer’s material breach of any obligation or duty under the agreement or any written employment or other written policies of our Company.

For purposes of the severance agreements, “good reason” means, generally, a material diminution in the executive officer’s authority, duties or responsibilities, a material diminution in the executive officer’s base compensation or target bonus opportunity, unless such a reduction is imposed across-the-board to senior management, a material change in the geographic location at which the executive officer must perform his duties, or any other action that constitutes our material breach of the agreement.

For purposes of the severance agreements, “change in control” is generally defined as:

2020 Equity Incentive Plan

We routinely grant our executive officers stock awards pursuant to our Amended 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. In the event of a change in control of the Company, if the successor corporation refuses to assume the awards, or to substitute substantially equivalent awards, the vesting of each outstanding award will be subject to accelerated vesting such that 100% of the awards will become vested and exercisable or payable, as applicable.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee has furnished this report on executive compensation.

This report, filed in accordance with Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K, should be read in conjunction with the other information relating to executive compensation which is contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and is not repeated here.

In this context, the Compensation Committee hereby reports as follows:

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

2023 Summary Compensation of NEOs

2023 Summary Compensation Table

The table below sets forth, for the year ended December 31, 2023, the base salary and annual cash incentive plan compensation earned by and all other compensation paid to our NEOs in 2022 and 2023.